Key Differentiators
- One Team, One Process
- In-depth Capital Structure Analysis
- Rigorous Top-Down and Fundamental Analysis
- Opportunistic, Flexible Approach
Strategy Summary
Strategy: U.S. Mid-cap growth Benchmark: Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Inception: February 2003 Strategy AUM: $470.0 million* As of 12/31/11
*Strategy AUM reflects all assets that are currently being managed (collectively) under the Calamos Mid Cap Growth Strategy.
Investment Team
Chief Investment Officers
John P. Calamos, Sr. Chairman, CEO, Co-CIO
Nick P. Calamos President of Investments, Co-CIO
Research Team*
2 Co-Heads of Research & Investments
5 Senior Strategy Sector Analysts
3 Senior Sector Analysts
8 Intermediate Analysts
12 Junior Analysts
Portfolio Analytics*
7 Portfolio Specialists
Infrastructure & Execution*
9 Trading
4 Risk Management Specialists
14 Investment IT
*Information is as of 12/31/11.
Characteristics |
Since Inception
Risk/Reward Statistics* |
|
|
Representative Portfolio
|
Russell Midcap Growth Index
|
|
|
Assets in Strategy^
|
$470.0 million
|
N/A
|
|
# of Holdings
|
62
|
466
|
Portfolio Turnover % (5-Year)
|
73.5%
|
N/A
|
Median Market Cap ($bil)
|
$8.5
|
$4.2
|
|
Weighted Average Market Cap ($bil)
|
$36.4
|
$7.9
|
|
ROIC %
|
25.7%
|
17.8%
|
|
Debt/Capital %
|
16.2%
|
35.7%
|
PEG Ratio (1 year forward)
|
1.2x
|
1.3x
|
|
^ Strategy AUM reflects all assets that are currently being managed (collectively) under the Calamos Mid Cap Growth Strategy.
|
|
|
|
Calamos Mid Cap Growth Composite
|
Russell Midcap Growth Index
|
|
|
Alpha
|
-0.63%
|
N/A
|
|
Beta
|
1.08
|
1.00
|
|
Std. Deviation
|
21.03%
|
18.82%
|
|
Upside Semivariance
|
20.26%
|
16.44%
|
|
Downside Semivariance
|
17.52%
|
13.98%
|
|
Sharpe Ratio
|
0.37
|
0.43
|
|
Info Ratio
|
0.02
|
N/A
|
|
* All risk-adjusted statistics are relative to the Russell Midcap Growth Index on an annualized basis, versus the Calamos Mid Cap Growth Composite. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Russell/Mellon Analytical Services LLC and Calamos Advisors LLC
|
|
Representative Portfolio Ten Largest Holdings‡
| Company |
|
% of Portfolio Weighting |
|
Sector |
|
| Apple, Inc. |
|
4.9 |
|
Information Technology |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. |
|
4.7 |
|
Health Care |
| Eaton Corp. |
|
3.6 |
|
Industrials |
| Dover Corp. |
|
3.3 |
|
Industrials |
| Priceline.com, Inc. |
|
3.2 |
|
Consumer Discretionary |
| Google, Inc. |
|
2.6 |
|
Information Technology |
| Complete Production Services, Inc. |
|
2.6 |
|
Energy |
| Teradata Corp. |
|
2.5 |
|
Information Technology |
| Autodesk, Inc. |
|
2.3 |
|
Information Technology |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. - Class A |
|
2.3 |
|
Information Technology |
‡The portfolio is actively managed. Holdings and weightings are subject to change daily. The holdings listed should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. Ten Largest Holdings exclude any government/sovereign bonds or options on broad market indexes the portfolio may hold.
Sector Allocation
|
Sector
|
|
Representative Portfolio %
|
|
Russell Midcap Growth Index
|
|
Under/Overweight%
|
|
|
|
Info. Technology
|
|
41.2%
|
|
18.1%
|
|
|
| Industrials | |
12.9 |
|
15.0 |
|
|
Energy
|
|
10.4
|
|
9.8
|
|
| Consumer Disc. |
|
9.7 |
|
20.3 |
|
|
Health Care
|
|
9.3
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
Materials
|
|
7.9
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
Consumer Staples
|
|
5.1
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
Financials
|
|
3.5
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
Telecom. Services
|
|
0.0
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
Utilities
|
|
0.0
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1Top 10 Holdings and Sector Weightings are calculated as a percentage of Net Assets. The tables exclude cash or cash equivalents, any government / sovereign bonds or broad based index hedging securities the portfolio may hold. You can obtain a complete listing of holdings by visiting www.calamos.com.
Fourth Quarter 2011 Attribution vs. Russell Mid Cap Growth Index
An overweight to higher growth companies detracted from relative performance. Also, increased exposure to certain segments of the reflationary sectors was early and detracted value, though we believe recent signs of coordinated global reflation efforts bode well for the current positioning. Moreover, we believe that valuations of U.S. growth equities remain compelling and offer particularly attractive risk/reward characteristics.
Security selection and an underweight to information technology detracted from returns. Specifically, holdings in the software industry and the IT consulting industry underperformed, although we expect these holdings to benefit as companies seek solutions to improve productivity and business performance. We maintain conviction in the sector due to the higher cash flows, lower debt levels, and cleaner balance sheets we see in many companies. We also believe valuations are particularly attractive. The sector continues to profit from many long-term secular growth themes, including strong consumer demand for products and services that provide access to information and entertainment, as well as those that enhance the productivity of businesses and individuals.
While an underweight to consumer discretionary was positive, security selection within the sector detracted from relative performance. The portfolio’s largest holdings in the sector are in the Internet retail industry. We maintain our conviction in these companies and believe they are positioned to benefit from global secular trends. Within the sector, we are focused on companies that offer strong global brands and diversified revenue bases, as well as those servicing a growing consumer base within the emerging markets.
An underweight to health care added value. However, the portfolio’s health care holdings underperformed and detracted value. Within the sector, we favor less-defensive areas such as the medical supply and equipment industry and biotech industry, as well as those furthest removed from increased government regulation.
Security selection and an overweight to the energy sector contributed to performance. Reflation efforts, such as global stimulus from the world’s central banks, became more prevalent during the quarter and supported the portfolio’s energy holdings. In our view, there is more upside potential for growth in the sector, as reflation efforts continue and the global demand for energy resources remains high, especially within emerging markets.
Strategy Vehicles
Separately Managed Accounts |
|
|
| Minimum: $5 million |
|
|
| |
|